Dr. Couch, do you believe that the seven churches in Revelation represent time-periods of church history?
ANSWER: This was a common view of Bible teachers some generations ago but there is no evidence, in history, or in the context of the book of Revelation, that this would be the case. Having taught graduate church history for decades I don't see these churches lining up with history. However it is true that the problems of these congregations can be found throughout church history, and even today in various assemblies. I have to put an explanation to that, however. Many things they were fighting cannot be found in churches today!
One of the rules of hermeneutics is that, if these churches have prophetic significance for the outline of church history there would have to be some kind of indication in the passages that would tell you that this is the case. And there are no such indications in the verses. The critics would say that we are just guessing, which indeed we would be doing! This is interpreting by eisegesis, that is, be putting an idea into the text rather than letting the text speak to you (exegesis).
I do not fault those who hold to the "historic-church" view of Revelation 2-3 but I don't hold to that position.
Thanks for asking.
Dr. Mal Couch (11/10)
|
Friday, November 12, 2010
The Seven Churches and Time Periods
Labels:
church history,
eisegesis,
exegesis,
hermeneutics,
Revelation,
Revelation 2,
Revelation 3